The Cook Out 400 runs on a tire Richmond has never seen. Two other races this season did. That is the whole edge.
By PitByNumbers Staff · Cook Out 400 · Richmond Raceway · Saturday, August 15, 2026 · 7:00 PM ET · USA Network · 400 laps The Tire Is The Tell Goodyear is bringing the D-5262 left-side and D-5256 right-side combination to Richmond this weekend, and it is the first time that left-side tire has ever been on this racetrack. That sounds like a reason to throw out the form book. It is the opposite.
This exact pairing has already run two Cup races in 2026, at Martinsville in March and at North Wilkesboro last month, which means the field has a two-race sample on precisely the rubber it will be managing Saturday night. Goodyear’s own product manager, Rick Heinrich, said it plainly: “Cup Series teams are familiar with this setup and already have some data to help plan their strategies this weekend... The track surface at Richmond is known for producing high tire wear and lap-time fall-off, so tire management will be critical.” So we stopped ranking drivers on “short tracks” as a vague category and ranked them on the two races that used this tire.
The order changes, hard. Shane van Gisbergen is the third-best average running position in the entire field across those two races and he is the longest price on this card. Brad Keselowski is 22nd of 37 across the broader short-flat comp set and has four top-10s in his last seven Richmond starts.
The top-10 market is where those contradictions get paid, because you are buying a finishing range instead of a trophy, and at a 400-lap track with high fall-off and one caution-free stretch of 170 laps last August, the finishing range is decided by who can keep a tire underneath the car. The comp numbers say fade him and we are going to tell you exactly how ugly they are before we tell you why we like him anyway. Across the five 2026 short-flat races, Phoenix, Martinsville, Bristol, North Wilkesboro and Iowa, Keselowski ranks 22nd of 37 drivers by average running position.
On the two races run on Richmond’s exact tire he spent only 38.2 percent of his laps inside the top 15, the worst share of anyone on this card. Iowa was a 27th. Phoenix was a 24.2 average running position, 26th in the field that day.
That is the case against, stated in full. Now the file that matters. Seven Next Gen starts at Richmond: 13th, 15th, 10th, 6th, 8th, 16th, 9th.
That is four top-10s in seven, an 11.0 average finish, and a 12.0 average running position at a track where his broader profile says he should be nowhere. Last August he started 6th, got swept into the lap-198 wreck through no fault of his own, and still finished 9th. And the one comp race that ran on this tire and rewarded tire management, North Wilkesboro, was his best short-track day of the season: 7th, ninth-best average running position in the field, 61.9 percent of laps in the top 15, seven laps led.
The honest caution is that his 2026 season is a 18.8 average finish with six top-10s in 23 starts, and a driver who is 22nd on comps can absolutely be 22nd here. But the price is asking whether he finishes inside the top 10 at the one track on the calendar that has consistently said yes, and it is paying nearly two to one to find out. Four of seven is 57 percent.
The number implies 34.5 percent. The Talladega winner has quietly become one of the better short-flat cars in the sport, and the 2026 short-flat races are where it shows up. At Bristol in April he ran 100 percent of his laps inside the top 15 with a 6.1 average running position, fourth-best in the field that day.
At North Wilkesboro in July he ran 95.8 percent of his laps in the top 15 with a 7.1 average, fourth-best again. Across the two races run on Richmond’s exact tire combination, he is 8th of 35 in the field. Across the wider five-race comp set, he is 9th of 37.
Both measurements agree, which is rare and worth something. The 2026 season backs it up in a way none of the others on this card can match: nine top-10s in 23 starts, a 39 percent rate, and a 14.8 average finish that is the best number on this page. He finished 3rd at Atlanta and 9th at Indianapolis inside his last five.
This is not a longshot profile being dressed up. It is the most consistent car we are buying this week, priced accordingly at the shortest number we will touch. Two honest cautions, and they are real.
First, his Richmond file is thin and unimpressive: three Next Gen starts, an 18.7 average running position, one top-10, which was an 8th in August 2024. Second, and more pointed, he told a pit reporter at Richmond last year, “I’m an all gas, no brake guy, so I’m not great at saving tires,” at a track Goodyear just told us will be decided by tire management. He is the exact profile Richmond has punished before.
The counter is that the two races on this specific tire were both tire-management exams and he passed them near the top of the class. Two weeks ago, in his Iowa race-week availability, Berry named the tracks he was looking forward to without being led there: “Iowa, Richmond and New Hampshire are coming up, places that I ran well in the 4 car and the 21 car.” He added, “I’ve got a lot of confidence that going into these next few weeks we’ve got what we need.” Then he went to Iowa and finished 4th, his first top-5 of a season he has described as one thing after another, with the ninth-best average running position in the field that day and 97.4 percent of his laps inside the top 15. Half of that sentence has already cashed.
The Richmond half has the best supporting file on this card. Four Next Gen starts here: a 2nd in spring 2023, an 11th, a 14th, and an 8th last August. That is an 8.8 average finish, better than anyone else we are playing this week, at a track where his late model background is the whole explanation.
Last August he ran 84.5 percent of his laps in the top 15 and spent the night battling Denny Hamlin for position without a single incident. The broadcast barely mentioned him, which is exactly what a clean top-10 run looks like. The caution is the loudest one on this page.
Berry is 19th of 35 on the tire twin, the worst rank of our five, dragged there by a North Wilkesboro race that ended in a wreck and a 36th. His 2026 season is a 25.5 average finish with four top-10s in 23 starts, and two of his last five races were a 33rd and a 36th. This is a volatile car being bought for a track-specific reason and a stated one.
We think the reason is good enough at nearly two to one. Preece’s tire-twin numbers are better than his reputation and better than his price implies. He is 11th of 35 in the field across Martinsville and North Wilkesboro, ahead of Christopher Bell and Brad Keselowski.
At Martinsville he ran 98.2 percent of his laps inside the top 15, the kind of number that only comes from a car that never falls out of the picture. At North Wilkesboro he finished 10th. Across the wider comp set he is 15th of 37 with a 22 percent top-10 rate on the season, and he arrives at Richmond 29 points behind Austin Cindric for the final Chase spot with three races to run, which is the most motivated a driver gets.
Richmond has given him one genuine flash and a lot of nothing. His five Next Gen starts here read 18th, 5th, 28th, 25th, 35th. The 5th came in July 2023.
Last August he won the pole, led the first 58 laps, and finished 35th after a strategy gamble unwound in the final stint, which the loop data grades as the second-deepest gap between how a car ran and where it finished in the whole race. He led 60 laps and posted 33 fastest laps, most in the field. The speed was real.
The result was not. Here is our honest disclosure, and it is a house rule we are choosing to override. Our own graded ledger says top-10 bets above +250 are a losing proposition, 4-for-46 this season, and short flat track top-10s have gone 1-for-11.
Preece at +260 is on the wrong side of both lines. We are playing him anyway because the tire-twin rank and the Martinsville top-15 share say the car is a genuine top-15 machine on this rubber, and because a driver racing for a Chase berth at a track where he has already stolen a top-5 is worth one exception. If you follow the rule instead of the exception, we will not argue with you.
This is the pick the tire data found, and it is the reason we rebuilt the comp set. Take the two 2026 races run on Richmond’s exact Goodyear combination and rank all 35 drivers who ran both by average running position. Van Gisbergen finishes third.
Not third among road racers, not third among longshots. Third in the entire field, behind only Denny Hamlin and Joey Logano, ahead of Ty Gibbs, Ryan Blaney, William Byron and Austin Cindric. Across those two races he ran 97.8 percent of his laps inside the top 15.
The individual races are more convincing than the average. At Martinsville in March he posted an 8.97 average running position, eighth-best that day, with 95.8 percent of his laps in the top 15. At North Wilkesboro in July he was better still: a 4.48 average running position, third-best in the field, 99.8 percent of laps inside the top 15, 49 laps led across four separate stints, and a 5th-place finish that was the first short-track top-5 of his Cup career.
His radio during it has become the best line of his season: “I’m leading. What the [expletive] do I do now?” Afterward he explained the track in terms that apply directly to Saturday: “It’s a bit like a road course here... It’s a real balance track, and you can really affect the car with your driving technique.” The case against is genuine and we are not hiding it.
Across the broader five-race comp set he ranks only 20th of 37, because Bristol was a 34th and Iowa was a 30th, and neither of those races used this tire. He has exactly one Richmond start, a 14th last August with an 18.9 average running position, which was respectable and nothing more. And he is clinging to a Chase spot with nothing but ovals left, which means he needs results and cannot afford chaos.
But the market is pricing his Bristol and his Iowa. We are pricing the two races that used the tire he is about to race on, and on those he is the third-best car in the sport. This is a top-10 card built on one idea, so it lives or dies on one idea: Richmond’s tire has a two-race history in 2026 and almost nobody is pricing it.
Two of these five, van Gisbergen and Hocevar, are here purely because the tire-twin ranking says they belong near the front of the field. Two more, Keselowski and Berry, are here because their Richmond records refuse to match their comp numbers, which is its own kind of signal at a track this specific. Preece is the one we are playing against our own published rule, and we told you that inside his section rather than burying it.
Four hundred laps, high fall-off, and a race that ran its last 170 laps caution-free a year ago means track position and tire discipline decide the finishing order, not speed. That is a top-10 market, not a win market, which is exactly why we are here. Receipts, not vibes.
Informational & entertainment only. Not betting advice. 21+.
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER. Odds as listed at time of writing and subject to move.